Tea With Socrates
Episode 1 Tuesday, November 3 Adaptive preference Arc One, one of five

Arc One · The Unreliable Narrator

Sour Grapes, or: How to Tell Growth From Surrender

There’s a person you used to want to be. At some point you stopped wanting it, and it felt like maturity. How would you know if that were false?

You stopped wanting something you couldn’t have, and it felt like growing up. From the inside, growing out of a want and giving up on one feel identical. This episode is about whether you could ever tell the difference.

The concept is adaptive preference: a desire that adjusts itself to what’s available and then covers its tracks. It starts as a fable about a fox and ends as a problem for anyone who thinks asking people whether they’re happy is the way to find out.

Then the objection: if your contentment doesn’t count as evidence, who gets to decide? That question doesn’t get answered. It gets worse.

Sections

  1. The pour
  2. The person you used to want to be
  3. The fox, and the worse version of the fox
  4. Where it stopped being about character
  5. The objection: who decides, then?
  6. What changed

Reading

  • Jon Elster, Sour Grapes (1983). The source; chapter III.
  • Martha Nussbaum, Women and Human Development (2000). The argument taken into the world.
  • Serene Khader, Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment (2011). The best case against everything in this episode.
  • Aesop, “The Fox and the Grapes.”
Transcript

Available on release.